Fibronectin-integrin interaction promotes fibroblast activation (nemosis) and crosstalk with tumor cells
نویسندگان
چکیده
.........................................................................................9 1. REVIEW OF LITERATURE .............................................................11 1.1 Cancer........................................................................................11 1.2 Fibroblasts ............................................................................... 12 1.2.1 Fibroblasts in tumor microenvironment ............................................... 13 1.2.2 Cells in tumor microenvironment ..........................................................14 1.2.3 Fibronectin................................................................................................16 1.2.4 Integrins as fibronectin receptors.......................................................... 17 1.3 Autophagy ................................................................................ 18 1.3.1 Induction and progression of autophagy.............................................. 19 1.3.3 Autophagy in cancer................................................................................22 1.3.3.1 Autophagy in tumor stroma and fibroblast activation...................25 1.4 The Cell cycle............................................................................26 1.4.1 Checkpoints ...............................................................................................27 1.4.3 Quiescence.................................................................................................28 1.4.4 Cellular senescence ..................................................................................28 1.5 Nemosis....................................................................................30 1.5.1 Nemosis and paracrine signaling...........................................................31 1.5.2 Nemosis and cancer.................................................................................32 2. AIMS OF THE STUDY ...................................................................34 3. MATERIALS AND METHODS .......................................................35 3.1 Cell culture (I-IV)............................................................................................35 3.1.1. Liposome-mediated siRNA transfections (I) ........................................36 3.1.2. Lentiviral mediated shRNA (II).............................................................37 3.2 Functional assays ...........................................................................................37 3.2.1 Soft-agar assay (II) .................................................................................37 3.2.2 Collagen co-culture assay (III) ..............................................................38 3.2.3 Tumor xenograft models (II)..................................................................39 3.3. Protein expression (I-IV)..............................................................................39 3.3.1 Western blot (I-IV)...................................................................................39 3.3.2 Immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence and senescenceassociated !-galactosidase (I-IV) ........................................................39 3.3.3 Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (IV) .......................... 40 3.3.4 LDH activity assay (II, III).................................................................... 40 3.3.5 Caseinolysis assay.................................................................................. 40 3.4 mRNA expression (II-IV) ..............................................................................42 3.4.1 RT-qPCR (II, IV).......................................................................................42 3.4.2 In situ hybridization (III) .......................................................................42 3.4.3 Microarray...............................................................................................43 3.4.3.1 Microarray data analysis....................................................................43 3.5 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) (II)...........................................44 3.6 Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (II)............................................44 3.7 Statistical analyses .........................................................................................44 4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ........................................................45 4.1 Fibronectin-integrin interaction is required for fibroblast spheroid formation and activation (I).........................................................................45 4.1.1 Effect of fibronectin on spheroid formation (I).....................................45 4.1.2 FN-integrin interaction and FN matrix formation in fibroblast spheroids (I) ...........................................................................................46 4.2 Gene expression changes in fibroblast spheroids compared to adherent fibroblast cultures (II)..................................................................48 4.3 Autophagic activity increases during early time-points (II).......................49 4.3.1 ERK and Akt as possible regulators of autophagy in fibroblast spheroids (II).......................................................................................... 51 4.4 The downregulation of cytoskeleton is associated with fibroblast spheroid formation (II) ................................................................................52 4.5 Fibroblast spheroid formation relates to cell cycle arrest (II)....................53 4.6 Spheroid-activated fibroblasts acquire secretory phenotype (II-III) ........54 4.7 Fibroblast spheroids express markers of senescence (II)...........................54 4.8 Nemotic fibroblasts secrete matrix metalloproteinases to modulate their environment (III).................................................................................56 4.9 Benign keratinocytes inhibit, whereas malignant keratinocytes promote nemotic activation (IV) ................................................................. 57 4.10 Fibroblast spheroids inhibit growth of malignant keratinocytes (II)......59 4.10.1 RT3 cell growth on soft-agar is attenuated by co-culture with fibroblast spheroids (II) ........................................................................59 4.10.2 Fibroblast spheroids attenuate the growth of xenograft tumors by inducing tumor cell senescence (II) ............................................... 60 4.11 The summary of results ................................................................................ 61 CONCLUDING REMARKS ................................................................62 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ....................................................................64 REFERENCES ...................................................................................66 ORGINAL PUBLICATIONS ...............................................................82
منابع مشابه
Differences in the Nemosis Response of Normal and Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts from Patients with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
BACKGROUND Tumor-stroma reaction is associated with activation of fibroblasts. Nemosis is a novel type of fibroblast activation. It leads to an increased production of growth factors and proinflammatory and proteolytic proteins, while at the same time cytoskeletal proteins are degraded. Here we used paired normal skin fibroblasts and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF) and primary and recurrent...
متن کاملUp-Regulation of Integrinsn α2β1 and α3β1 Expression in Human Foreskin Fibroblast Cells after In-Vitro Infection with Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1
The interaction of Herpes Simplex Virus type 1 (HSV-1) with human fetal foreskin fibroblast (HFFF) cell was studied using a recent isolate of HSV-1 which was propagated in Hep-2 cells. HFFF cells were challenged with HSV-1 with a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1 virus/cell for 24 hours. Flow cytometric analysis demonstrated that HSV-1 challenged HFFF cells expressed increased levels of α2β1...
متن کاملTumor cell and carcinoma-associated fibroblast interaction regulates matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in oral squamous cell carcinoma
Co-culture of periodontal ligament (PDL) fibroblasts and SCC-25 oral squamous carcinoma cells (OSCC), results in conversion of PDLs into carcinoma-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). Paracrin circuits between CAFs and OSCC cells were hypothesized to regulate the gene expression of matrix remodeling enzymes in their co-culture, which was performed for 7days, followed by analysis of the mRNA/protein e...
متن کاملFibroblast nemosis induces angiogenic responses of endothelial cells.
Increasing evidence points to a central link between inflammation and activation of the stroma, especially of fibroblasts therein. However, the mechanisms leading to such activation mostly remain undescribed. We have previously characterized a novel type of fibroblast activation (nemosis) where clustered fibroblasts upregulated the production of cyclooxygenase-2, secretion of prostaglandins, pr...
متن کاملShear stress modulates the interaction of platelet-secreted matrix proteins with tumor cells through the integrin alphavbeta3.
Interaction of tumor cells with the vascular wall is required for metastasis from the bloodstream. The precise interaction among metastatic cells, circulating platelets, the vessel wall, and physiological flow conditions remains to be determined. In this study, we investigated the interaction of shear on metastatic cell lines adherent to lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-treated endothelium. Tumor cells...
متن کامل